Google scholar arxiv informatics ads IJAIS publications are indexed with Google Scholar, NASA ADS, Informatics et. al.

Call for Paper

-

August Edition 2022
International Journal of Applied Information Systems solicits high quality original research papers for the August 2022 Edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is July 15, 2022.

Different Versions of the Monty Hall Problem

Mazen Alrahili

Different Versions of the Monty Hall Problem
International Journal of Applied Information Systems
Year of Publication: 2017
Publisher: Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Series: Volume 11 Number 9
Authors:Mazen Alrahili
10.5120/ijais2017451642
Download full text

  1. Mazen Alrahili. Different Versions of the Monty Hall Problem. International Journal of Applied Information Systems 11(9):12-17, January 2017. URL, DOI BibTeX

    @article{10.5120/ijais2017451642,
	author = "Mazen Alrahili",
	title = "Different Versions of the Monty Hall Problem",
	journal = "International Journal of Applied Information Systems",
	issue_date = "January 2017",
	volume = 11,
	number = 9,
	month = "Jan",
	year = 2017,
	issn = "2249-0868",
	pages = "12-17",
	numpages = 6,
	url = "http://www.ijais.org/archives/volume11/number9/963-2017451642",
	doi = "10.5120/ijais2017451642",
	publisher = "Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA",
	address = "New York, USA"
}

Abstract

The Monty Hall problem is a conditional probability example in which one of three doors has a big prize and other two doors conceive worthlessly. The game features are a rational decision between stay or switch given the constraints of the game. This paper aims to explain the different versions of the Monty Hall Problem in a many way to approve and solve the Monty Hall problem.

Reference

  1. Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems.
  2. Ding, W., and Marchionini, G. 1997 A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. The University of Maryland at College Park.
  3. Fröhlich, B., and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  4. Tavel, P. 2007 Modeling, and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd.
  5. Sannella, M. J. 1994 Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398., The University of Washington.
  6. Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289-1305.
  7. Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE.
  8. Y.T. Yu, M.F. Lau, "A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions," Journal of Systems and Software, 2005, in press.
  9. Spector, A. Z. 1989. Achieving application requirements. In Distributed Systems, S. Mullender.
  10. Rosenhouse, J. (2009) The Monty Hall Problem. Oxford University Press, New York.
  11. Mazen Alrahili. Simulation of the Monty Hall Problem. International Journal of Computer Applications 152(6):16-19, October 2016.

Keywords

Monty Hall Problem