| International Journal of Applied Information Systems |
| Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA |
| Volume 13 - Number 3 |
| Year of Publication: 2026 |
| Authors: Ismail Idowu Akuji, Babajide Olanrewaju Ahmed, Taofik Abiodun Ahmed, Idris Babatunde Adeyemi, Ayodeji Jubril Alabi |
10.5120/ijais8bfa29462311
|
Ismail Idowu Akuji, Babajide Olanrewaju Ahmed, Taofik Abiodun Ahmed, Idris Babatunde Adeyemi, Ayodeji Jubril Alabi . Loan Default Prediction System using Forward and Backward Propagation Techniques: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Applied Information Systems. 13, 3 ( Jun 2026), 22-32. DOI=10.5120/ijais8bfa29462311
In recent times, loan default has become a critical problem for financial institutions, underscoring the need for an accurate and reliable system that is capable of identifying vulnerable defaulters. This facilitates borrowers’ creditworthiness assessment, which in turn assists in mitigating potential losses. Hence, this study proposes a comparative analysis of forward and backward propagation neural networks for predicting loan defaulters. The dataset used for the models was sourced from the Kaggle repository, and it consists of 255,347 instances and 17 features, which were undersampled to 47,444, 50% Class 0 and 50% Class 1, due to the class distribution being imbalanced. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to identify the set of features that may or may not influence the target feature. K-fold cross-validation was applied to assess the robustness and generalization ability of the proposed models. Results show that both models improved substantially after cross-validation, especially in terms of accuracy and loss. The FPNN increased from 0.7110 baseline accuracy to 0.8861 mean cross-validated accuracy. At the same time, the BPNN improved from 0.6920 to 0.8858, indicating that cross-validation produced a more stable and reliable estimate of model performance. Similarly, the loss values dropped from 0.584308 to 0.314693 for FPNN and from 0.605187 to 0.314709 for BPNN, which suggests better learning and stronger generalization after validation across multiple folds. The findings of this study highlight the potential of machine learning techniques in improving loan default prediction while reducing lending risk, particularly the efficacy of cross-validation in affirming the robustness and generalization of machine learning models. Future studies can build on this research by using different datasets and integrating hyperparameter tuning to further improve models, especially in terms of precision, thereby contributing to an effective, reliable, and deployable loan default prediction model.