Google scholar arxiv informatics ads IJAIS publications are indexed with Google Scholar, NASA ADS, Informatics et. al.

Call for Paper

-

November Edition 2021

International Journal of Applied Information Systems solicits high quality original research papers for the November 2021 Edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is October 15, 2021.

An Innovative Lightweight Framework for Effective RM for Small and Medium Sized Software Development Centers in Oman

Asma Al Balushi, Santhosh John Published in Software Engineering

International Journal of Applied Information Systems
Year of Publication: 2014
© 2013 by IJAIS Journal
10.5120/ijais14-451247
Download full text
  1. Asma Al Balushi and Santhosh John. Article: An Innovative Lightweight Framework for Effective RM for Small and Medium Sized Software Development Centers in Oman. International Journal of Applied Information Systems 7(10):28-33, October 2014. BibTeX

    @article{key:article,
    	author = "Asma Al Balushi and Santhosh John",
    	title = "Article: An Innovative Lightweight Framework for Effective RM for Small and Medium Sized Software Development Centers in Oman",
    	journal = "International Journal of Applied Information Systems",
    	year = 2014,
    	volume = 7,
    	number = 10,
    	pages = "28-33",
    	month = "October",
    	note = "Published by Foundation of Computer Science, New York, USA"
    }
    

Abstract

With the accelerated growth of the software development industry in the world, more complex and sophisticated systems are developed. Requirements Management is one of the essential and challenging tasks when developing software application Poor requirements management practices are one the factors that lead to over budget, delayed, and failure of software projects. The small and medium sized software development organizations and departments in Oman are facing challenges in requirement management. Defining, categorizing, reviewing, documenting and changing requirement are the main activities of requirement management that are unfortunately not well practiced/tackled in the mentioned domain. The aim of this paper is to investigate the requirement management challenges, practices, and tools that Omani software houses facing through conducting professional interviews and questionnaire with requirement engineers and programmers. The findings showed inadequate requirements management practices are used and the utilization of tools is omitted. Subsequently, a solution is provided in the form of a framework that will assist in overcoming the current issues; by incorporating the three crucial components of requirements management practices: requirements traceability, team collaboration and quality metrics for requirements specifications. This will be followed by a prototype tool to be evaluated in the future in these organizations.

Reference

  1. IAG Consulting, "Waterfall vs. Agile – a knowledge problem, not a requirements problem," 19 7 2012. {Online}. Available: https://zenexmachina. wordpress. com/tag/gartner/. {Accessed 30 8 2014}.
  2. T. H. A. Balushi, P. R. F. Sampaio and P. Loucopoulos, "Eliciting and prioritizing quality requirements supported by ontologies: a case study using the ElicitO framework and tool," Expert Systems, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 129-151, 5 2013.
  3. H. F. Hofmann and F. Lehner, "Requirements Engineering as a Success Factor in Software Projects," IEEE Software, pp. 58-66, 8 2001.
  4. R. Saavedra, L. Ballejos and M. Ale, "Software Requirements Quality Evaluation: State of the art and research challenges," in 14th Argentine Symposium on Software Engineering, 2013.
  5. K. Mahalakshmi, D. R. Prabhakar and D. V. Balakrishnan, "Kernel Optimization For Improved Nonfunctional Requirements Classification," Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 64-72, 2 2014.
  6. G. Ge´nova, J. M. Fuentes, J. Llorens, O. Hurtado and V. Moreno, "A framework to measure and improve the quality of textual requirements," Requirements Eng-Springer-Verlag London Limited, 2011.
  7. P. ZAVE, "Classification of Research Efforts in Requirements Engineering," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 315-321, 1997.
  8. M. J. Ali, "Metrics for Requirements Engineering," in Master's Thesis, 2006.
  9. O. Lopez, "Requirements Management," Journal of Validation Technology, pp. 78-86, 2011.
  10. V. Sinha, B. Sengupta and S. Chandra, "Enabling Collaboration in Distributed Requirements Management," IEEE Software, pp. 52-61, 2006.
  11. A. Finkelstein and W. Emmerich, "The Future of Requirements Management Tools," 2000.
  12. I. Accompa, "Why Use Requirements Management Software?," 2012. {Online}. Available: http://web. accompa. com/requirements-management-software. {Accessed 4 6 2014}.
  13. M. Shahid, S. Ibrahim and M. N. Mahrin, "An Evaluation of Requirements Management and Traceability Tools," World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 5, pp. 538-543, 2011.
  14. J. M. C. d. Gea, J. Nicolás, J. L. F. Alemán, A. Toval, C. Ebert and A. Vizcaíno, "Requirements Engineering Tools," IEEE SOFTWARE, pp. 96-91, 2010.
  15. R. R. Sud and J. D. Arthur, "Requirements Management Tools A Qualitative Assessment," {Online}. Available: http://www. eprints. cs. vt. edu/archive/00000656/01/RM_Tools. pdf. {Accessed 4 6 2014}.
  16. M. U. Bokhari and S. T. Siddiqui, "Metrics for Requirements Engineering and Automated Requirements Tools," in Proceedings of the 5th National Conference, New Delhi, 2011.

Keywords

Requirements Management, Requirements Management Tools, Requirements Traceability, Requirements Collaboration.