CFP last date
30 June 2025
Reseach Article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Irrigation Technique Classification in Precision Agriculture

by Saviour Inyang, Daniel Essien, Ezichi Ndudirim
International Journal of Applied Information Systems
Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Volume 12 - Number 47
Year of Publication: 2025
Authors: Saviour Inyang, Daniel Essien, Ezichi Ndudirim
10.5120/ijais2025452020

Saviour Inyang, Daniel Essien, Ezichi Ndudirim . Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Irrigation Technique Classification in Precision Agriculture. International Journal of Applied Information Systems. 12, 47 ( Jun 2025), 37-46. DOI=10.5120/ijais2025452020

@article{ 10.5120/ijais2025452020,
author = { Saviour Inyang, Daniel Essien, Ezichi Ndudirim },
title = { Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Irrigation Technique Classification in Precision Agriculture },
journal = { International Journal of Applied Information Systems },
issue_date = { Jun 2025 },
volume = { 12 },
number = { 47 },
month = { Jun },
year = { 2025 },
issn = { 2249-0868 },
pages = { 37-46 },
numpages = {9},
url = { https://www.ijais.org/archives/volume12/number47/comparative-analysis-of-machine-learning-models-for-irrigation-technique-classification-in-precision-agriculture/ },
doi = { 10.5120/ijais2025452020 },
publisher = {Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA},
address = {New York, USA}
}
%0 Journal Article
%1 2025-06-11T02:21:47.099255+05:30
%A Saviour Inyang
%A Daniel Essien
%A Ezichi Ndudirim
%T Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Irrigation Technique Classification in Precision Agriculture
%J International Journal of Applied Information Systems
%@ 2249-0868
%V 12
%N 47
%P 37-46
%D 2025
%I Foundation of Computer Science (FCS), NY, USA
Abstract

Efficient water management in agriculture is crucial for sustainable food production, especially in regions facing water scarcity and climate variability. This research investigates the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to classify irrigation methods which includes: Overhead, Surface, and Precision Irrigation based on relevant agricultural data. The study evaluates the performance of four widely used ML models: Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), with the aim of identifying the most suitable model for accurate and consistent classification. Each model was trained and tested using labeled datasets and assessed through performance metrics including Precision, Recall, F1-Score, Accuracy, and Cohen’s Kappa. Confusion matrices and ROC-AUC curves were also utilized to visualize class-specific performance. The results indicate that XGBoost outperformed all other models, achieving the highest classification accuracy (86%) and a Kappa score of 0.79. It demonstrated superior performance across all irrigation classes, particularly excelling in the Precision Irrigation category. Random Forest followed closely, with an accuracy of 80% and Kappa of 0.70, notably achieving a perfect precision score for Overhead Irrigation. SVM delivered moderate performance with 72% accuracy and a Kappa of 0.57, while KNN lagged behind, scoring 64% accuracy and 0.46 Kappa. The comparative analysis highlights the effectiveness of ensemble-based methods, particularly XGBoost, for handling diverse and potentially non-linear agricultural datasets. The findings support the integration of advanced ML models in agricultural decision support systems, enabling more precise irrigation management and optimizing water resource utilization.

References
  1. R. Jebakumar, “A Study on Smart Irrigation Using Machine Learning,” Cell & Cellular Life Sciences Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.23880/cclsj-16000141.
  2. M. Attri et al., “Improved Irrigation Practices for Higher Agricultural Productivity: A Review,” International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, pp. 51–61, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i930737.
  3. K. I. M. Abuzanouneh et al., “Design of Machine Learning Based Smart Irrigation System for Precision Agriculture,” Computers, Materials and Continua, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 109–124, 2022, doi: 10.32604/cmc.2022.022648.
  4. M. A. Youssef et al., “Enhancing irrigation water management based on ETo prediction using machine learning to mitigate climate change,” Cogent Food Agric, vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311932.2024.2348697.
  5. K. Liu, Y. Bo, X. Li, S. Wang, and G. Zhou, “Uncovering Current and Future Variations of Irrigation Water Use Across China Using Machine Learning,” Earths Future, vol. 12, no. 3, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1029/2023EF003562.
  6. J. I. Ubah, L. C. Orakwe, K. N. Ogbu, J. I. Awu, I. E. Ahaneku, and E. C. Chukwuma, “Forecasting water quality parameters using artificial neural network for irrigation purposes,” Sci Rep, vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04062-5.
  7. R. Benameur, A. Dahane, B. Kechar, and A. E. H. Benyamina, “An Innovative Smart and Sustainable Low-Cost Irrigation System for Anomaly Detection Using Deep Learning,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 4, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24041162.
  8. N. Dawn et al., “Implementation of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Internet of Things (IoT) in revolutionizing Agriculture: A review on recent trends and challenges,” International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, vol. 30, 2023, doi: 10.52756/ijerr.2023.v30.018.
  9. A. Glória, J. Cardoso, and P. Sebastião, “Sustainable irrigation system for farming supported by machine learning and real-time sensor data,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 9, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21093079.
  10. C. Carslake, J. A. Vázquez-Diosdado, and J. Kaler, “Machine learning algorithms to classify and quantify multiple behaviours in dairy calves using a sensor–moving beyond classification in precision livestock,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21010088.
  11. D. Hernandez, L. Pasha, D. Arian Yusuf, R. Nurfaizi, and D. Julianingsih, “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Agriculture and Waste Management: Towards a Green Future,” International Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (ITALIC), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 150–157, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.33050/italic.v2i2.552.
  12. A. Rohan, M. S. Rafaq, M. J. Hasan, F. Asghar, A. K. Bashir, and T. Dottorini, “Application of deep learning for livestock behaviour recognition: A systematic literature review,” Sep. 01, 2024, Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109115.
  13. M. E. Hossain, M. A. Kabir, L. Zheng, D. L. Swain, S. McGrath, and J. Medway, “A systematic review of machine learning techniques for cattle identification: Datasets, methods and future directions,” Jan. 01, 2022, KeAi Communications Co. doi: 10.1016/j.aiia.2022.09.002.
  14. N. Siebrecht, “Sustainable Agriculture and Its Implementation Gap Overcoming Obstacles to Implementation,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 3853, May 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12093853.
  15. D. Dönmez, M. A. Isak, T. İzgü, and Ö. Şimşek, “Green Horizons: Navigating the Future of Agriculture through Sustainable Practices,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 3505, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16083505.
  16. A. Goldstein, L. Fink, A. Meitin, S. Bohadana, O. Lutenberg, and G. Ravid, “Applying machine learning on sensor data for irrigation recommendations: revealing the agronomist’s tacit knowledge,” Precis Agric, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 421–444, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11119-017-9527-4.
  17. A. El Bilali, A. Taleb, and Y. Brouziyne, “Groundwater quality forecasting using machine learning algorithms for irrigation purposes,” Agric Water Manag, vol. 245, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106625.
  18. A. IORLİAM, S. BUM, I. S. AONDOAKAA, I. B. IORLIAM, and Y. SHEHU, “Machine Learning Techniques for the Classification of IoT-Enabled Smart Irrigation Data for Agricultural Purposes,” Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 378–391, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.54287/gujsa.1141575.
  19. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/bhadramohit/agriculture-and-farming-dataset
  20. S. Inyang and I. Umoren, "Semantic-Based Natural Language Processing for Classification of Infectious Diseases Based on Ecological Factors," International Journal of Innovative Research in Sciences and Engineering Studies (IJIRSES), vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 11-21, 2023.
  21. I. Umoh, V. Essien, and S. Inyang, "Optimizing Hypertension Risk Classification through Machine Learning," International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 186, no. 14, pp. 21–29, 2024.
  22. S. Inyang and I. Umoren, “From Text to Insights: NLP-Driven Classification of Infectious Diseases Based on Ecological Risk Factors,” Journal of Innovation Information Technology and Application (JINITA), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 154–165, 2023.
Index Terms

Computer Science
Information Sciences

Keywords

Irrigation Techniques Machine Learning Agricultural Data Analysis Classification Models