Google scholar arxiv informatics ads IJAIS publications are indexed with Google Scholar, NASA ADS, Informatics et. al.

Call for Paper

-

November Edition 2021

International Journal of Applied Information Systems solicits high quality original research papers for the November 2021 Edition of the journal. The last date of research paper submission is October 15, 2021.

Performance Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Reactive MANET Routing Protocols for RPGM and MG

Prajakta M. Dhamanskar, Nupur Giri Published in Wireless Network

IJAIS Proceedings on International Conference and workshop on Advanced Computing 2013
Year of Publication: 2013
© 2012 by IJAIS Journal
10.5120/icwac1325
Download full text
  1. Prajakta M Dhamanskar and Nupur Giri. Article: Performance Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Reactive MANET Routing Protocols for RPGM and MG. IJAIS Proceedings on International Conference and workshop on Advanced Computing 2013 ICWAC(2):43-48, June 2013. BibTeX

    @article{key:article,
    	author = "Prajakta M. Dhamanskar and Nupur Giri",
    	title = "Article: Performance Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Reactive MANET Routing Protocols for RPGM and MG",
    	journal = "IJAIS Proceedings on International Conference and workshop on Advanced Computing 2013",
    	year = 2013,
    	volume = "ICWAC",
    	number = 2,
    	pages = "43-48",
    	month = "June",
    	note = "Published by Foundation of Computer Science, New York, USA"
    }
    

Abstract

Mobile Ad Hoc Network is a collection of mobile nodes forming temporary network. In MANET routing protocols are classified as Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid. The work presented here evaluates performance of three Reactive routing protocols such as AODV, DSR and TORA under six performance metrics such as packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, packet loss, normalized routing load, throughput and end to end delay. The nodes follow Reference Point Group Mobility model (RPGM) and Manhattan Grid (MG) model. The simulations are carried out using NS2. From the simulation results comparison of these three protocols is presented in a table and represented using KIVIAT diagrams. Contribution in this work is beneficial in deciding which protocol to choose for better QoS.

Reference

  1. Gupta A. K. , Sadawarti H. , Verma A. K. , Performance analysis of AODV, DSR & TORA Routing Protocols. IACSIT, 2010
  2. Tyagi S. S. , Chauhan R. K. , Performance Analysis of Proactive and ReactiveRouting Protocols for Ad hoc Networks. 2010 International Journal of Computer Applications
  3. Kuppusamy P. , Thirunavukkarasu K. , Kalavathi B. , A study and Comparison of OLSR, AODV, and TORA Routing Protocols in Ad Hoc Networks. 2011 IEEE.
  4. Maan F. , Mazhar N. : MANET Routing Protocols Vs Mobility Models,A Performance Evaluation. 2011 IEEE.
  5. Liu Tie-yuan?CHANG Liang?Gu Tian-long. , Analyzing the Impact of Entity Mobility Models on the Performance of Routing Protocols in the MANET. 2009
  6. Shrestha A. , Tekiner F. , On MANET Routing Protocols for Mobility and Scalability
  7. Aschenbruck N. , Ernst R. , Gerhards-Padilla E. , Schwamborn M. , BonnMotion -Mobility Scenario Generation and Analysis Tool
  8. http://www-public. it-sudparis. eu/~gauthier/MobilityModel/mobilitymodel. htm
  9. http://net. cs. unibonn. de/fileadmin/ag/martini/projekte/BonnMotion/src/BonnMotion_Docu. pdf
  10. T. Valentina, S. Mirjana, B. R. Slavica. , MANET Routing Protocols vs. Mobility Models: Performance Analysis and Comparison
  11. P. Dhamanskar, N. Giri, Performance Evaluation of On Demand MANET routing protocols for different mobility models. IJETAE, 2012

Keywords

MANET, AODV, DSR, TORA, RPGM, MG.